
By Jesus Diaz Apple Frees Publishers and Users from App Store's Draconian Content Subscription Rules
Before, the App Store guidelines said the following:
The new guidelines change this completely, eliminating any requirement for offering the same price and the requirement to offer external subscriptions as in-app purchases:
The change comes right after the Financial Times gave the finger to Apple this week, releasing an HTML5-based app to avoid the then-obligatory Apple's content subscription tax. Now, the content subscription makes sense for almost everyone, consumers and content publishers alike. Consumers would be free to pay their content in any way they want and publishers would be able to charge anything they want, anywhere they want. The only unhappy parts here are the book resellers, Amazon and Barnes & Noble. If they want people to buy through their apps, they will have to pay Apple a tax. However, that doesn't stop Amazon from pushing content from their web to their iPad and iPhone app, without passing through Apple's controls. Would this mean that subscription prices in the app store will increase? Maybe in some cases. But if magazines and newspapers want to remain competitive, they would probably have to put up with Apple's cut on the App Store sales, like every other app developer in the world. It's good to know that Apple can recognize their failures and reverse their draconian impositions from time to time. [MacRumors] | June 9th, 2011 Top Stories |
No comments:
Post a Comment